Posts Tagged ‘cap and trade’

Governor Christie propses pulling Jersey out of onerous cap and trade program

May 26, 2011 Leave a comment

The governor is proposing pulling out of the voluntary RGGI program, which is a voluntary state cap-and-trade program.

Good riddance.  The program is quickly becoming a cess pool of political corruption (surprise!), meanwhile our state has seen New Jersey companies pick up and leave because of higher energy costs due to the program, among other concerns.

Wasn’t cap-and-trade supposed to be good for businesses?

POTUS: Drill Baby, Drill

March 31, 2010 Leave a comment

Obama opens up to offshore drilling:

The Obama administration is proposing to open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.

Under the plan, the coastline from New Jersey northward would remain closed to all oil and gas activity. So would the Pacific Coast, from Mexico to the Canadian border.

The proposal — a compromise that will please oil companies and domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states and many environmental organizations — would end a longstanding moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres of ocean.

Yet another flip-flop by the President, but at this point nobody in the media or the Obama sycophants in the blogosphere appear too concerned about that.  Obama is a “D” after all. 

But I’m a bit more cynical than that.

Chris Bowers:

This is, effectively, home state pork for Conservadem Senators who are viewed as winnable votes on the energy bill. Five of the original fifteen Conservadems are listed above (Webb and Graham are not Conservadems). Of course, since the new offshore drilling policy will operate through the executive branch, there is no guarantee at all that the Obama administration will actually get an energy bill out of this deal. Nonetheless, and leaving aside the political efficacy of this ploy, it is clearly a political move designed to make a bill more viable.

This makes sense.  I think the White House has cap-and-trade next on the agenda.  Winning the healthcare fight was huge, but I don’t think Obama wants another long and drawn out battle like that again–especially as we get closer to the midterms.  Today’s announcement seems to be made to win over the moderates in the party for the energy bill in the Senate.

Like healthcare reform not being about healthcare, this proposal is not about energy but about getting votes.

And one more thing—it seems Sarah Palin was right.

AR-Sen: Interesting new Blanche Lincoln ad

March 7, 2010 1 comment

I’m with Jim Geraghty on this one.  This new ad by the Lincoln campaign is a blatant move to the center:

Lincoln is a career politician and would love to keep it that way–she’s not about to fall on any swords at the behest of Frau Pelosi.  Also, keep in mind that Senator Lincoln is under a fierce attack by the liberal wing of her party and the nutroots who are actively supporting her primary challenger, Bill Halter, because of her stance on healthcare reform. 

And so much for the political “realignment” we kept hearing about over the last two election cycles.   This ad rails against the two crown jewels in the Democratic party agenda—cap and trade and healthcare reform.   Hell, she even sticks it to the party itself with the “I don’t answer to the Democratic party” bit. 

Even more striking was that she mentions opposition to “the public option” by name.  As toxic as the public option has been over the past year. and to the extent that the left embraces it, that was real gutsy on her part.